| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Benjamin Olson
   |
Posted - 2006.09.12 17:25:00 -
[1]
 Originally by: General Apocalypse
Maller wins. Here's how to do it.
2 x Medium Nos
2 x Focused Medium Pulse Laser
2 x 425 mm Autocanons
1 x AB
1 x web
1 x scram
1 x MAR
2 x EANM II
1 x Damage Control
2 x 400 mm plate
It's a tight fit. But if you can put it all together you shoud be able to kill ruptures .
 That high slot layout has to say something about Amarrs current state...
|
Benjamin Olson
|
Posted - 2006.09.12 17:58:00 -
[2]
Originally by: Dark M00n
Originally by: Dread Phantom
I did some extensive testing last night and rupture came out on top every time
And what were those testing exactley?
As for the maller being a ship mented to fit lasers...there is no problem with it as long as the bonus doesn't involve lasers. It's ment to tank, that's why the bonuses, and with the right skills you get a pretty mean tank. And that's the beauty of it, that you pretty much can fit any weapon you want and surprise your opponent. From lasers to AC and to blasters...
So if 1 vs 1 Maller fit with lasers and at an equal skill level the Rupture might win, overall Maller is the winner. Both at pvp and pve. As in gang, rupture don't stand a chance...
Dark moon youve been playing for 10 days...maybe you have an alt? Either way its not that we CANT fit AC's its just sad we CANT use the guns Amarr is meant to use.
|
Benjamin Olson
|
Posted - 2006.09.12 18:43:00 -
[3]
Logic my boy, logic. Maller cant dish out enough damage to take on a well setup rupture. It cant tank well, but so can the rupture, and the rupture isnt even meant for tanking.
So both have good tanks, but rupture does more damage. Id say rupture wins.
|
Benjamin Olson
|
Posted - 2006.09.12 18:48:00 -
[4]
Ah and to tackle what im sure will be your next argument, "What if the mallers using AC's?". The Rupture has a bonus to its guns still outdamaging the Maller by 1.327% which is almost an extra turret. So as far as tank is concerned Ruptur = Maller, as far as damage is concerned, Rupture > Maller.
Do we really need more evidence?
|
Benjamin Olson
|
Posted - 2006.09.13 19:21:00 -
[5]
Edited by: Benjamin Olson on 13/09/2006 19:21:49
Haimeh. Someone who thinks the maller can win a fight, meet me in haimeh and send me an Email. For a fight against a Rupture. Any skilled minmatar pilot will drop a Maller in seconds. Tank or no Tank.
And its not like were pulling numbers out of our rumpius maximus...we use the ships on a daily basis for ratting or missions. We KNOW they suck, and it gets annoying when people tell us to "shutup" or "screw it" and they havent used a Maller once in their lives.
I believe it was mentioned in this thread earlier?
EVE physics > Amarr.
|
Benjamin Olson
|
Posted - 2006.09.18 23:13:00 -
[6]
Originally by: Laocoon
In my experience, rax > all other T1 crusiers. No i can't be bothered to explain why, so i'll just get burned but nvm.
A fully T1 rax can win... 85% of cruiser fights at a guess, and costs just shy of 5 mill (after insurance). A T2 rax will win 95%, but is closer to 20m, which i can't afford 
QFT. And in the case of the maller, we'll just rearange a few of his words.
Replace Thorax with 'ALL T1 CRUISERS' and replace 'All other T1 Cruisers' with Maller.
Then we get the true statement that "All other T1 Cruisers < Maller"
|
| |
|